Skip to content
Industrial Inspection & Measurement Instruments

Type 1 vs Type 2: Why Magnetic Pull-Off Gauges Are Obsolete

Type 1 vs Type 2: Why Magnetic Pull-Off Gauges Are Obsolete

The bottom line

Type 1 and Type 2 are not marketing tiers — they are an instrument classification written into ASTM D7091-22 and SSPC-PA 2-2022. Any job involving project acceptance or a report requires Type 2.

Where the classification comes from

In its Scope clause, ASTM D7091-22 divides thickness gauges into Type 1 magnetic pull-off and Type 2 electronic. SSPC-PA 2-2022 references that definition directly, so a US coating contract that specifies acceptance per SSPC-PA 2 automatically adopts the classification.

How the two types actually differ

Aspect Type 1 magnetic pull-off Type 2 electronic
Principle Balance between magnet force and spring tension Magnetic induction / eddy current, converted to an electrical signal
Readout Mechanical scale or needle, non-linear Digital display, linear scale
Repeatability Noticeably affected by pull-off speed and angle Largely independent of technique
Shim verification Unsupported or discouraged on most models Standard practice, performed every shift
Unit switching Usually fixed (mil or μm) Switchable μm / mil
Data capability None Mean / min / max / standard deviation / storage
Typical use Rough screening, non-acceptance work Project acceptance and reporting

Why acceptance work rejects Type 1

The SSPC-PA 2 acceptance logic rests on three numbers: the arithmetic mean, the proportion of readings inside the 80%-100% band, and the lowest individual reading. That demands readings that are repeatable, verifiable and recordable.

A Type 1 reading is the outcome of a mechanical balance. Repeat measurements at the same spot scatter noticeably, and there is no way to run a shift verification with a shim. Applying the 80/20 rule to such readings makes the acceptance decision unreliable in itself.

The three-step Type 2 procedure under D7091

D7091-22 splits the workflow into three steps that must not be conflated:

  1. Calibration — performed by the manufacturer or a third-party laboratory, once, recorded in the certificate and traceable to a national metrology institute;
  2. Verification — performed by the operator every shift, using shims of known thickness to confirm the reading is still inside the controlled band;
  3. Adjustment — performed on the spot when verification fails: zero correction on bare substrate plus a shim correction.

For this to work at all, the gauge must support shim verification and zero adjustment — which is precisely what defines Type 2.

The Dongru models and their type

Every Dongru coating thickness gauge is Type 2 electronic. By application: vehicle appraisal — DR-A5 (Fe/NFe automatic switching) and DR130; contractor general use — DR280A (0-1250 μm) and DR380A (0-2000 μm); zinc coating weight — DR360A; high range — DR15A, DR6000A.

Common misconceptions

  • “Type 1 is tougher and lasts longer on site” — durability has nothing to do with type; Type 2 instruments are built to industrial protection standards too.
  • “Being labelled Type 2 means it complies with ASTM D7091” — the type is one registration item. Compliance also depends on calibration traceability, operating procedure and a stated uncertainty.
  • “Cheap means Type 1” — the cost floor for electronic gauges dropped long ago. Low price no longer implies older principles.